2009/11/5 Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk>: > We did astonishingly, staggeringly, unbelievably, improbably well with > Wikipedia. Failing to replicate that is to be expected; it's unlikely > we could deliberately manage such a success without a shedload of good > luck. "It's got a wiki in it" isn't a magic spell, after all.
I've always thought the next likely hit would be Commons. It'd need something like the cats-as-tags feature, though. I'd like not to be able to describe it as "Sorta like Getty Images but the search sucks." - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
