There is already a statistics page, http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/Index.html skype: node.ue
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:13 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, > gerard.meijs...@gmail.com writes: > > > > Please read it as an appeal to reply to foundation-l in moderation. > > Please > > read it as an appeal to post liberally to this list as we do not have an > > alternative.>> > > ------------------- > > > > > > Speaking of self-moderation., a google search on > Foundation-l "gerard meijssen" shows > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a& > > rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=7zN&num=50&q=foundation-l+%22gerard+Meijssen%22&lr=& > aq=f&oq=&aqi=<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&%0Arls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=7zN&num=50&q=foundation-l+%22gerard+Meijssen%22&lr=&%0Aaq=f&oq=&aqi=> > > 33,000 pages > > Is there a way to create a chart showing how many messages each poster has > posted to the list? Also Gerard I think if you're going to use an argument > about the value of those people who *aren't* posting, we need to know who > they are. Perhaps we don't want them to post either. > > Until we get some hard facts on the issue, how is any decision supposed to > be able to be reached? > > W.J. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l