Even if the license change applied only to material started after the present, it would make future collaboration possible
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Laura, > > Thanks for your work on the proposal. I hadn't looked at fanhistory in any > detail before, and enjoyed discovering it's lifecycle through your blog. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:51 PM, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I may not have time to respond to your comments in detail, but I think >> it is important to say that I appreciate the way that you are >> approaching this. >> >> Critical analysis of the potential "import" of this project is much >> easier if the project has a well defined mission, and the project >> leaders are only interested in the migration if it is a good fit >> within the WMF mission. >> >> > I agree with John here. Your approach and proposal are greatly appreciated. > Educational projects aimed at educating others, providing material for > future research, or gathering useful knowledge are certainly ones we should > give consideration to adopting. The copyright issues is a sticking point, > as geni notes -- I strongly recommend that you look into changing your > license, regardless of the result of this proposal, so that you can better > work with other projects in the future. > > SJ > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l