on 11/26/09 9:06 PM, Chad at innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: > We had that. They called themselves the "Association > of Member's Advocates." They were disbanded because > everyone saw them as a huge waste of time with 0 net > benefit. > Everyone? I'm not familiar with the one you mention, but, let's try again.
Marc Riddell > > On Nov 26, 2009 8:56 PM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > > > I already pointed out that you cannot impose "friendliness". Our current > state is one in which any particular admin may sit on any particular editor > with or without adequate cause and that editor has nearly no power to affect > a hearing. There is no advocate for the editors who are not admins. > > Until that situation changes, we cannot claim to be moving toward a friendly > environment. > > What we need is an Office of the Editor Advocate. Any arrested person has > the right to an attorney, provided free of charge by the state. That is > what we need. Advocate-attorneys who are on the side of the arrested > editor. > Great idea! MR _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
