On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Geoffrey Plourde <geo.p...@yahoo.com> wrote: > There are some pages that should legally be restricted, like the bylaws. i do > believe that most pages should be open to public editing because of the risk > of some non member Aussie thinking of a better way to do something and being > stifled. Those should be protected anyway, stuff like bylaws shouldn't be getting touched without consensus from a AGM. But there are methods to protect "important" pages like that, for example standard page protection methods or the flagged rev system for another example.
-Peachey (Also gah at cross posting to multiple lists via cc'ing, seems to cause some issues in gmail =( so this may not be in/on all the correct lists/threads.) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
