Yes. This is idiotic. The logo contest followed the same rules as all other submissions to Wikipedia -- they were submitted under the GFDL.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:52 PM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 February 2010 00:23, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I know the actual logos are trademarked, but the proposals aren't. If > > these are creations by Wikimedians, then hopefully they are under a > > free license. They should be uploaded to Commons and organized, if > > so! > > > > -Chad > > For the most part no. They were deliberately ot released so the the > copyright could be transferred to the foundation. Some have since been > released when they found other uses > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Example.jpg for example) but most > have not been. > > > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l