It seems like Fox News can't get enough. Fox News has a history of being the opposite of its so-called "fair and balance" reporting. I think that they went too far with saying that “Wikipedia’s continued interest in child sexual exploitation is troubling not only because the site hosts some questionable images, but because it can easily serve as a gateway to other sites containing child pornography,"
I'm pretty sure 100% that Wikimedia doesn't support child porn in any way, plus these images are art that were created so long also they are in public domain, and if they were child porn, they would be removed already. I also know that Erik Möller does not support child porn. If he did, he wouldn't be at the foundation right now. Fox News went too far with this, and they should actually investigate the story before making accusations. Fox News is biased. Techman224 On 2010-05-07, at 5:44 PM, Fred Bauder wrote: > Updated April 27, 2010 > Wikipedia Distributing Child Porn, Co-Founder Tells FBI > > "The parent company of Wikipedia is knowingly distributing child > pornography, the co-founder of the online encyclopedia says, and he's > imploring the FBI to investigate." > > http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/27/wikipedia-child-porn-larry-sanger-fbi/ > > > Erik Möller is particularly unfair. > > Fred Bauder > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
