On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Excirial <wp.excir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sexual and medical images might be entirely inappropriate for children, but > they provide valuable information for other groups of people - for example, > a gynecologist or a medical student might have a completely non sexual > reason to look at certain content. Protecting one group might well mean > that > we deny valuable data to another. > So which group is more important? Which is the better answer, to tell families to go elsewhere, or to tell the specialists to go elsewhere? I dunno, when framed that way it seems the answer is to be family-friendly, and to let the specialists get their information in specialist resources. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l