On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Ryan Lomonaco <wiki.ral...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:50 PM, K. Peachey <p858sn...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >> I do to, depending on how they are applied, for example I would much >> prefer on a case by case basis compared to everyone, since a few >> people are bring active and decent discussion where as some people are >> just trolling/omg censorship is bad type stuff. >> >> -Peachey >> > > The issue hasn't come up yet, but I would approach things on a case-by-case > basis - for example, I wouldn't moderate a Wikimedia staff member who posted > more than 30 times because they were answering questions from other list > members. Also, if someone is moderated for hitting the limit, I would > approve posts beyond their initial 30 posts if I think that the post is > useful, and adds to the discussion.
Is there any option to tell them commons has its own mailing list instead of adding it to the foundation-l? Cheers, > If anyone has any questions about the post limit, please feel free to talk > to either myself or Austin, on-list or privately. > > -- > [[User:Ral315]] > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- KIZU Naoko http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese) Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l