I guess people the world over know that at least one member of the board has been quite active in the selection process of late. ;)
Also, in cases of illegal content, the Foundation may well find -- or have found -- itself in a position to direct that material be deleted, thus playing an active role in the selection of what material to present. And the Board has released statements on policy in this regard. Andreas --- On Thu, 20/5/10, Mark Wagner <carni...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Mark Wagner <carni...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Legal requirements for sexual content -- help, > please! > To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Date: Thursday, 20 May, 2010, 21:55 > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:33, Still > Waterising > <stillwateris...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I can accept that Commons may not fit under the > definition of > > "secondary producer." However, when Wikipedians choose > a sexually > > explicit image from Commons, the crop it and add a > caption, this may > > fall under the "selection or alteration of the > communication" exception. > > You're misunderstanding the word "operators" here. > The only people > who matter for the "selection or alteration of the > communication" are > the Wikimedia Foundation: the board members and the > foundation > employees. Everyone else, no matter what on-site > title they have, is > simply a user of the site. > > -- > Mark > [[User:Carnildo]] > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
