Alex wrote: > Except unless we consider the initial edit to be the first check, its > not correct. Only one person independent from the editor is reviewing > each edit.
This is one of my main objections to the term. The write-in candidate "Revision Review" appears to combine the best elements of "Pending Revisions" and "Double Check." Tango and I (who strongly prefer opposing candidates) agree that it's a good option. It seems like an excellent solution, and I hope that it can garner sufficient support. Irrespective of his/her opinion, everyone should weigh in at the designated discussion page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions/Terminology David Levy _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
