On 05/24/2010 08:31 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > We could use a name which expresses_nothing_ > about what is going on, thus making it clear that you can't figure it > out simply from the name. >
That did cross my mind, and it was tempting. But practically, many busy journalists, causal readers, and novice editors may base a lot of their initial reaction on the name alone, or on related language in the interface. By choosing an arbitrary name, some fraction of people will dig deeper, but another fraction will just retain their perplexity and/or alienation. Basically, an arbitrary name struck me as a wasted opportunity to convey at least a hint to a lot of people, so I didn't even suggest any names like this. William _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l