On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, this. > > The list of available languages is a key part of a page, not a > navigation nicety. > > They used to be available at the top of an article by default, until > that started taking up a few inches of screen space across the board. > We could still use a small bit of text reading "also in N other > languages" that is similarly prominent: above-the-fold, near the top > of the page. > > SJ > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >
I'm lost in this sea of emails. Is anybody arguing that showing interwikis expanded by default is hurtful? I understand that one dev said roughly: "revert, this was designed so and any change must be authorized by howie" and that (Sue?) said : "we had a meeting and decided that hiding the interwikis wasn't really bad". And sprinkled over there I read a couple "we hid them since they were cluttering". Now what is the argument about *that specific "clutter"* is bad? Who else besides UX opinion and staff supporting UX has an argument about showing interwikis being hurtful so much that the problems overshadow the benefits of showing them? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
