On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, to get back to the original question: Is it or is it not > acceptable to you that the community of one Wikipedia decides that > certain pictures will not be shown on their wiki? And is it or is it > not acceptable that they use the morality of the nationality or other > group that most of them belong to in doing so? I think I would accept that some language wikis decide, by consensus, that they will not show illustrations of Mohammed under any circumstances. They should not ask for a boycott of another language, though. They could have a protest page with a list of users who want to sign up to it. Sticking a banner on the main page - and worse; as the only content - I disagree with. Paedophilia is unlawful all around the world; but let's say it were legal in one culture and an associated language wiki hosted pictures of sex acts with minors; I think en:wp would correctly be in uproar. I don't think we would respond by having the issue on our front page in any form and especially not as the single item of content. en.User:Bodnotbod _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
