On 17 July 2010 12:40, <wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote: > John Vandenberg wrote: >> in the article about Jesus.
>> If you haven't noticed, the images of Muhammad on the core articles >> relating to Islam are not created by someone who had a bit too much >> free time on their hands. The images of Muhammad that we use are >> images of an object which is held in a university library or museum, >> _because_they_are_important_. > Those don't appear to be the ones that are being complained about. Its > the Baby Jesus Butt Plug style ones that they have issue with. This turns out not to be the case. In practice, anything that is even *purported* to be an image of Mohammed is condemned. (And, as the article on the history of such images notes - this is a modern POV of one particularly noisy and violent group rather than a constant over the history of Islam.) - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
