The community of each wiki can decide which illustrations are best for a certain article, true.
Using foundation resources (banner, cpu, bandwidth) to campaign against other foundation projects should be avoided. Protest against decisions of WMF is one thing, lobbying against a whole WMF project is something else. On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Prodego <prod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Talking about the inclusion of different images is beside the point. Each > project can, and does, decide what content is appropriate for it. You could > call this selection "censorship", although it is very much an editorial > decision that anyone writing anything must make. If a particular wiki > decides not to show some particular image then so be it. There is no problem > with what consensus on different wikis decides, be that about article > wording, image inclusion, style guidelines... The only problem I see is that > the main page of a WMF site being used to make a statement about another > site (which happens to also be a WMF site). This I do not consider to be > acceptable. It is outside the scope of "the growth, development and > distribution of free, multilingual content" that the WMF claims to be about. > Regardless of if acewiki has a problem with another site, they should not be > using the main page of Wikipedia to air their grievances. > > Prodego > > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
