On 1 September 2010 00:27, John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com> wrote: > You, and the RW article about WP, start from the assertion that > Wikipedia is successful. Successful at what? Success at Google > rankings/pageviews/popular culture? Is that the only appropriate > measure of an encyclopedia; an encyclopedia which is putting other > encyclopedia's out of business? What is it unsuccessful at? The RW > article about WP does little to demonstrate a rational persons > observation of WP. It reads like the writer(s) are drunk on coolaid.
This appears to be a very inefficacious way for you to edit the wiki page you're talking about. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
