> Given that the person making these > criticisms is aware of this distinction (I could be wrong. Perhaps his > whole argument premises on the point that the WMF should be a content > provider, rather than a host), his continual attacks on the content don't > appear to consistent and give the appearance (to me based on my view) of > attacking the WMF because he has a personal axe to grind. > > -- > twitter: purplepopple > blog: ozziesport.com
You've defined disingenuous and bad faith, which seem to apply. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
