On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:36 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: >.. > There have been plenty of studies on drugs, which were not paid for, by > anyone with a vested monetary interest in changing the drug's market outlook. > Being flippant as John was, hardly forwards the conversation.
The point I was making is that there is a lot of different types of research, funded by different groups with different agendas. The PLOS Medicine article is based on a dataset of 78 interventional studies, 81 observational studies, and only 47 scientific reviews. Also, they do not dissect the data based on the reputability of the publishing venue. We should only use peer-reviewed research published in reputable journals, which eliminates vast quantities of 'research'. -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
