It was a matter of time before someone brought this subject up ;) The refusal of paypal, mastercard and visa to process payments to wikileaks is something i have watched with concern. Effectively, the victim has been denied the acceptance of gifts and payments without any court involvement. What this means for freedom and justice i leave to your own conclusions.
Should not any action be directed to all three or four organizations? But i doubt anything is achieved by denying ourselves gifts. I wish you joy and happiness, teun spaans On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Robert Tice <robti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suggest that use of Paypal is contraindicated due to their deliberate > efforts to inhibit the spread of information by closing their account with > Wikileaks. It is inappropriate for Wiki to be associated with Paypal or > Amazon.com. These corporations are the opposite of what Wikipedia and > associated entities hope to be or currently are. Closing the account with > Paypal will also send a message to Amazon that there are consequences to > efforts to censor the knowledge base of humanity. > > Thanks for reading this. I hope to see debate and action on this proposal. > > Robert T. > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l