I'd like to precise because of my bad english that I don't how to handle "polite" questioning without looking condescending or angry. I am uttering my words with the most profound respect to Erik even if I dissent about some topics with him.
Erik wrote: >> I don't think any of the fundraising banners that ran made it >> substantially harder to access the information that people were coming Erik, why would people be complaining specifically about them if it's not about their disturbance? Of course you're entitled to have your personal opinion about the banners' effects on YOURSELF (though I think you mentioned your 'pain points increasing too but not that much' earlier, I don't remember the exact wording). Of course you are. However speaking in vague and general terms right after testimonials and complaints could look like denial of OTHERS' feelings. Those reports could be genuine and even right. The facts could be that the 'banners' (aren't they self-published ads really?) ARE annoying (even worrying for some) and that the discussion should be allowed instead of denied. My 2p. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
