2011/1/15 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > On 15 January 2011 15:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> > wrote: > >> Now, fight. > > First review the discussion that has already taken place at WT:RFA
I suppose that you refer to the English Wikipedia. This list is about more than just the English Wikipedia. Before writing that proposal i reviewed many, many pages of "RFA is broken" discussions not just in the English Wikipedia, but in Hebrew, Russian and Catalan ones, too. Nowhere have i found a proposal to dump the concept of adminship completely and to split it into several roles, although i admit that i didn't read all the archives through. The closest thing that i found to my proposal is what happens in the Portuguese Wikipedia, which has the "Deleters" group (it has a lovely name in Portuguese - "Eliminadores"). The discussions that i did read say that RfA *process* is broken because the questions are repetitive, because the nominees are not required to identify themselves, because there's no provisional adminship, because the desysopping process is dysfunctional, because the bureaucrats' cabal decides whatever it wants without regard to discussion etc. I say that that the "A" in RFA shouldn't exist. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l