> > *The closest thing that i found to my proposal is what happens in the > Portuguese Wikipedia, which has the "Deleters" group (it has a lovely name > in Portuguese - "Eliminadores"). > *
Well, in Portuguese Wikipédia we don't want to spit the adm flag to destroy it. We are only give the chance to someone who only wants to do a part of the Administrator work can help the community without have to pass for all process of be a administrator. What you propose is create a "protector", a "blocker" and a "Media Wiki editor" to go with the "Deleters" group and exting the adm flag. That was never in discussion in pt.wiki _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt/> (351) 963 953 042 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.* 2011/1/15 Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> > 2011/1/15 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > > On 15 January 2011 15:26, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> > wrote: > > > >> Now, fight. > > > > First review the discussion that has already taken place at WT:RFA > > I suppose that you refer to the English Wikipedia. This list is about > more than just the English Wikipedia. > > Before writing that proposal i reviewed many, many pages of "RFA is > broken" discussions not just in the English Wikipedia, but in Hebrew, > Russian and Catalan ones, too. Nowhere have i found a proposal to dump > the concept of adminship completely and to split it into several > roles, although i admit that i didn't read all the archives through. > The closest thing that i found to my proposal is what happens in the > Portuguese Wikipedia, which has the "Deleters" group (it has a lovely > name in Portuguese - "Eliminadores"). > > The discussions that i did read say that RfA *process* is broken > because the questions are repetitive, because the nominees are not > required to identify themselves, because there's no provisional > adminship, because the desysopping process is dysfunctional, because > the bureaucrats' cabal decides whatever it wants without regard to > discussion etc. > > I say that that the "A" in RFA shouldn't exist. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l