----- "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very doubtful indeed. Wikipedia might, conceivably, be considered a > trusted third party, but there is no way the rest of world would and > we can't accept content that is licensed to Wikipedia only.
I would think it likely that as the BBC have already made the decision, in principle, to send h2g2 on its way then expanding the licence to drop any NC requirement would be a highly probable parting gift. Certainly worth asking them to change the licence anyway. Alison _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
