On 21 February 2011 19:39, Teofilo <teofilow...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/2/21 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > (...) >>> What is more complicated is what happens in a movie theatre. In my >>> opinion, the theatre owner should tell the viewers where the movie is >>> available for download on the internet. >> >> Look at you. You are stuck in one mode of thinking. Why should a web >> based version of the video even exist. > > The yet to be written Free Video License might say that this > requirement applies only in the case when the original creator first > released the first version on the internet.
"released the first version on the internet" I do so love it when people try and use the term internet in licensing terms. May I draw you attention to RFC 1149 or as it is better known IP over Avian Carriers? The internet is ill defined and you've just given me another term to abuse > Alternative ways of providing the original version might be allowed > with a wording similar to that of GFDL for transparent copies : offer > to send them by traditional mail, at a reasonable cost. Licenses work better if people don't have to spend time arguing over what counts as a reasonable cost. > I was thinking about a Powerpoint presentation. Well yes thats rather the problem. There are also slideshows with actual physical slides. I've got some around somewhere. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l