2011/4/5 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> > > On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > > > A lot of the projects that Wikimedia is investing in today are small and > > focused on particular needs of the Wikimedia Foundation, not the Wikimedia > > community. One example might be an article feedback tool that's largely > > focused on ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Public Policy grant > > requirements rather than actually being a useful tool for rating and > > evaluating articles. (Imagine if you could find the most fascinating > > articles, similar to ted.com's system; now look at what Wikimedia has > > implemented.) > > > *cough* From 2005: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/1.0 > > Magnus put together a quick version, but Brion didn't like the code > and it never happened. However, mine is just one such proposal. > Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*.
... And in the Hungarian Wikipedia it was even implemented quite a long time ago. If i recall correctly, at some point i saw it in the Polish, too. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com "We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace." - T. Moore _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
