This does all raise an interesting question of what jurisdictions actually cover. In the "superinjunction" case for example, which of these is legally able to be sued:
- A UK citizen who posts the names online from their home in the UK and then remains in the UK after - obviously "yes". - A US citizen who reads the names on Twitter and re-posts them online from their hotel while on vacation in the UK, then remains in the UK for some time - A UK citizen who reads the names on Twitter and re-posts them online from their hotel while on vacation in the US 1/ actionable while still on vacation in the US? 2/ actionable upon return to the UK? - A US citizen who reads the names on Twitter and re-posts them online from their home in the US 1/ actionable while in the US (having not traveled)? 2/ actionable when they travel to the UK on vacation a while later? Just curious which of these is litigable or in contempt, and which is not. FT2 _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
