Also; hard to see anyone suing you for communicating the info for the purposes of supressing it :-)
Tom Morton On 20 May 2011, at 23:08, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 May 2011 18:02, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>> On 20 May 2011 22:47, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>> Please mail User:Oversight with any such instance you are aware of. >>> >>> That's not actually legal. >>> >>> -- >>> geni >>> >> >> What on earth is illegal about assisting the project in avoiding >> publishing defamatory information? >> >> > > What Geni means is that if he (as a UK resident) identified something that > violated the superinjunction, emailing Oversight would be sufficient for him > to violate the superinjunection. I am not certain that is 100% correct, if > he does not name any names, but I can understand that perspective. As it > is, there are plenty of non-UK citizens/residents watching the articles > involved to address the situation, so generally speaking UK > residents/citizens should not feel they are obliged to put themselves at > risk. > > Risker/Anne > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l