On 22/05/2011 21:04, Fred Bauder wrote: >> > > By the way, I think this NYT"s article: > > https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/22/us/22gossip.html?ref=todayspaper > > "The Gossip Machine, Churning Out Cash" > > may be of some relevance. I don't think we should pander in this way, > regardless of public interest by the public, the media, or our editors. > Perhaps just a note on any article about a celebrity that there is public > interest by the tabloids in their personal affairs. >
"The Gossip Machine, Churning Out Cash": an article where paragraph after paragraph is ... wait for it ... gossip. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
