Not at all! That would be bad, and misses the point - I don't care at all who he is in meat space.
But consider me unable to pick apart the million threads of information about his on-wiki activities. I've tried, and need a better intro. Tom On 4 June 2011 01:20, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 June 2011 01:10, Thomas Morton <morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Given the situation can we not be clear on the details of this? > > > > I have various views on the matter, but all of them really depend on what > > exactly this person did. > > > > As with all such matters I see no reason why discussion of the details > > cannot be conducted visibly, and if provided with the adequate level of > > detail I would be happy to venture an opinion. > > > > But precluding that, you are asking the views of a group of people who > > probably do not have a full (or event partial) view of the facts of this > > case... for which you are asking for a global response.... > > > > And you are then wondering why they question this issue! > > > > I think there is no question is cases such as this; lay the details > plainly, > > and screw any pussy footing around the details. If this individual has a > > history that means BAD THINGS will happen, I feel details will sway more > > than allusions. > > > > Tom > > We know Poetlister's meatspace identity. Are you demanding that we repeat > that? > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l