Ray, I agree with you. The trust metric is not meant to substitute critical thinking.
What I try to do seems to me quite interesting.Google uses links between pages to rank them. This metric uses links between people to rank pages. It is intended as a search engine. What is more, links between people have semantic meaning and pages have properties. 2011/6/19 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> > On 17 June 2011 16:08, Marco Chiesa <chiesa.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > To be honest, when you release your work under cc-by-sa you grant a > > third party the right to reuse a (small or large) part of your work to > > make a derivative work. The license in itself is not what determines > > that the live version of a Wikipedia article is the last one, this > > happens because of Wikipedia policies. And of course, your (old) > > version is not deleted from the article history apart from a few > > cases. The point is: Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, if > > people don't accept this they can always publish somewhere else. > > > Indeed. "No ownership of articles" does not follow from the licence - > it's just the way things happen to be done on Wikipedia. > > For comparison, I understand that Wikibooks are considered somewhat > "owned" by the person starting the book. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l