At the time of the License Commitee with the vote we had te results also very fast...
Dude... Its all possible when they check all the votes made on day 1 on day 2 etc etc... And the system is very simple to work with. Best, Huib 2011/8/21, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Philippe Beaudette > <phili...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen < >> cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote >>> concluding and the results being announced? >>> >>> >> First, I disagree that it's "ridiculously unrealistic". Vote checking has >> already started and will continue throughout the polling. Second, >> hindsight >> is 20/20. I'll tell you that it's a balancing act... we've gotten it >> right >> a few times and we've gotten it wrong a few times. It's been years since >> this type of all-projects election was held for anything but a Board of >> Trustees election, and so, yeah, mistakes will be made. But let's just >> wait >> and see on the timeframe, shall we? No doubt an extension will have to >> happen, but.... what's the harm? If we take a couple extra days to >> announce >> the results, who has been harmed? >> >>' > > Months, not extra days, dude. > > > -- > -- > Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat Kind regards, Huib Laurens WickedWay.nl Webhosting the wicked way. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
