2011/9/8 Sarah <slimvir...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 05:35, Yann Forget <yan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But we do peer review images after they have been uploaded on Commons >> or Wikipedia. >> >> It seems that, 10 years after Wikipedia and its sisters have been >> created, you still do not understand that there are wikis. >> >> Regards, >> >> Yann >> > Yann, I yesterday looked at the Veganism article, only to find a > photograph in the infobox, not of yummy tofu scramble as before, but a > close-up of a woman's genitals, with a vibrator and what looked like a > man's fingers. I clicked on it, and saw it was being hosted by the > Wikimedia Foundation, uploaded from Flickr by the Flickr upload bot.
Actually we already have a list of "objectionable" images for blocking this kind of vandalism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list I am not sure a new tool is needed for that, unless you find the image objectionable in itself, but this is another issue. > Objecting to this isn't a question of being prudish or of censorship, > or of being anti-wiki. But if we want to attract mature editors, women > editors, editors from outside the majority cultures on Wikipedia, and > serious readers, this kind of thing is obviously very off-putting. So > we risk limiting our reach by not dealing with it. > > Sarah Regards, Yann _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
