Am 16.09.2011 22:53, schrieb Stephen Bain: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Andre Engels<andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd say, drop the idea that the filter is supposed to be perfect. A filter >> that is little-used can get a rough content first time around, preferably >> specified by the person asking for the filter, then people using the filter >> can suggest adding or removing images. Volunteers can go and work on the >> filters if they want, but if they don't, the filter will just be changed by >> such suggestions. > Indeed. I think some of the problems some people are predicting have > been drastically exaggerated. > > As long as the option to hide all images is also implemented, we can > quite simply add a disclaimer when anyone goes to turn on a filter > indicating that if complete exclusion is particularly important to > them, they should choose the option to hide everything by default. > Would we do that for text as well? Where is the fundamental difference between text and images? Both can be objectionable or offending to some readers/viewers. Is there a real difference?
Wouldn't be a simple button to hide all images be enough to reach our goal, without the need to introduce categories? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
