> Zitat von Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com>: > >> The second problem will be the categorization progress. We would >> categorize the images for others, not our selfs, and we also have no >> sources for argumentation. But there is another problem. We already >> discuss about the inclusion of images inside related articles >> discussion >> pages. While some image might not be appropriate for inclusion in one >> article, it might be the perfect, valuable, needed for understanding, >> maybe offensive illustration for another article. > > From what I understood the image filter will not have subjective > criteria like "a little offensive", "very offensive", "pornography", > but neutrally decidable criteria like "depicts nude female breasts", > "depicts the face of Muhammad", "depicts mutilated dead body". If you > select these criteria carefully there should be no need for any > "sources" for your decision to put a file in the criterion's category. > Either the image depicts the category topic or it doesn't. > > Marcus Buck > User:Slomox
But some depictions of such things are offensive or pornographic and some not at all. Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l