On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org>wrote:
> (not responding to anyone in particular) I'm one of the people who tried to > participate in the discussion without taking a strong standpoint > (intentionally - because I'm quite nuanced on the issue, and open for good > arguments of either side) and I have to fully agree with Ryan. I have yet > been unable to participate in this discussion without either being ignored > fully (nothing new to that, I agree) or being put in "the opposite camp". I > basically gave up. > Yeah, tell me about it. I've commented a couple times in public and in private to no avail, since I don't want to talk about what they want to focus on. Post a link to a blog, and the thread has 95 replies. Go figure. > > So I do have to say that I agree with the sentiment that the discussion is > not very inviting, and is actually discouraging people who want to find a > solution in the middle to participate... > ...Hoping for a constructive discussion and more data on what our 'readers' > actually want and/or need... > > Lodewijk > I agree. > > No dia 30 de Setembro de 2011 11:40, BĂ©ria Lima <berial...@gmail.com > >escreveu: > > *Now, it's completely fair to say that the filter issue remains the > > elephant > > > in the room until it's resolved what will actually be implemented and > > how. > > > * > > > > > > You forgot the "*IF*": IF the elephant will be or not implemented. > > Wrong thread, but there is no if. -- ~Keegan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l