I wrote: > > Apart from the name (which the MediaWiki developers inexplicably > > refused to change), the bad image list is entirely compliant with the > > principle of neutrality (barring abuse by a particular project, which > > I haven't observed).
MZMcBride replied: > Not inexplicably: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14281#c10 Actually, that's precisely what I had in mind. Maybe it's me, but I found Tim's response rather bewildering. It certainly isn't standard procedure to forgo an accurate description in favor of nebulous social commentary/parody, particularly when this proves controversial. David Levy _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
