On 16/10/2011 19:36, Tobias Oelgarte wrote: > Am 16.10.2011 16:17, schrieb ???: >> On 16/10/2011 14:50, David Gerard wrote: >>> On 16 October 2011 14:40, ???<wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Don't be an arsehole you get the same sort of stuff if you search for >>> >>> Presumably this is the sort of quality of discourse Sue was >>> complaining about from filter advocates: provocateurs lacking in >>> empathy. >>> >> >> Trolling much eh David? >> >> >> But thanks for showing once again your incapacity to acknowledge that >> searching for sexual images and seeing such images, is somewhat >> different, from searching for non sexual imagary and getting sexual images. >> > I have to agree with David. Your behavior is provocative and > unproductive. I don't feel the need to respond to your arguments at all, > if you write in this tone. You could either excuse yourself for this > kind of wording, or we are done. >
Now you wouldn't be complainng about seeing content not to your liking would you. What are you going to do filter out the posts? Bet your glad your email provider added that option for you. Yet another censorship hipocrite. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
