Am 19.10.2011 11:07, schrieb Andrew Garrett: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, but that is not proof of what we as a community understand the >> principle to mean, it means the board is on crack. > That's not a helpful contribution to this discussion. > But if i look at the current reactions, some might agree with this point of view. So far i did not see any reaction to provide sufficient information, so that would strengthen the argumentation of the WMF or the Board. All we get represented are assumptions on what the problem might be and that it might be existing. There was not a single study that was directed at the readers, particularity not a single one directed at a diverse, multicultural audience. All we got is the worthless result of the referendum.
I ask Sue and Philippe again: WHERE ARE THE PROMISED RESULTS - BY PROJECT?! I asked for this shit multiple month ago. I repeated my request on daily/weekly basis. All i got wasn't a T-Shirt, it was nothing. That makes people like me very angry and lets me believe that the WMF is either trying to hide the facts, to push their own point of view, or that they are entirely incompetent. Alternatively they are just busy with counting the money... I lost all trust inside the Foundation and I believe that they would sell out the basic idea of the project, whenever possible. Knowledge + Principle of least astonishment, applied to everything, no matter how the facts are? You truly did not understand the foundation of knowledge. Knowledge is interesting because it is shocking. It destroys your own sand-castle-world on daily basis. Hard words? Yes it are hard words, based upon the current situation and reactions. All we got are messages to calm down, while nothing changes. Now we read at some back-pages (discussions spread out everywhere) that there will be a test-run, to invite the readers to flag images. Another measure to improve the acceptance if the filter will be enabled, another study based on a only English speaking community/audience to make it the rule over thumb for every project? It seams to be the case. But where does all this will to implement a filter come from? No one said it clearly, no one published reliable source ("Harris report", a true insider joke) and you expect us to believe this shit? The referendum was a farce, the new approach is again a farce. The only way left to assume good faith is to claim that they are on crack. Anything else would be worse. nya~ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l