On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter <pute...@mccme.ru>wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:33:30 +0100, WereSpielChequers > <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Can we make sure that any new generation Article Feedback tool is > properly > > tested, and that testing includes: > > > > 1. Implementing it on a random group of articles and comparing them > > with > > a control sample to see which group of articles had the more edits > from > > newbies; > > 2. Whether the collecting of feedback on ways to improve the article > > generates additional comments or diverts some editors away from > actually > > fixing the article. > > 3. Which group of articles recruited the most new editors to the > pedia. > > > > Please don't implement it if the testing shows that it diverts people > from > > fixing articles to pointing out things that others can fix. > > > > And I think this time showing it to the Research Committee prior to > running the tests would be a good idea. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > I'll bring these points up with the folks :). If you have any others, do come to office-hours. O. > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
