Totally disagree with you, Yaroslav. Do you really think a traditional (you know, traditional in Wikipedia equivalent to bureaucratic) communication and social system, friendship-free, at wikis reduces the efficiency? Why the friendship and camaraderie in editions and talk should reduce the efficiency of quality? Why working in a pleasant ambiete worse results. I think economists and business-men disagree with you.
For your e-mail I found that you are probably Russian. You probably have read Tolstoi, Anna KarĂȘnina. Using a literary example, Lievin, the landowner, greatly increased his profit by changing the method of work of his moujiks. The moujiks used to work in bad taste and bad-tempered when just followind orders in a bad envronment. When Lievin adopted a collaborative approach, when the moujiks could work without the several rules at a amicable environment, profits rose. For Wikis is the same thing. Only the ideals are not enough. We have to have a friendly, a pleasant, a nice environment. We've to make the time of editions a good time to us. We've to smile editing Wikipedia. And know our work is important to the community, moral support. Wikilove make Wikipedia less a obligation and more a thing which we need every single day. This is the point. _____________________ MateusNobre MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects (+55) 85 88393509 30440865 > To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:22:27 +0400 > From: pute...@mccme.ru > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Show community consensus for Wikilove > > > When I spoke ''family'' I wanted to say we need a more likable system of > > communication. We need a real collaborative method, which not only fit > for > > the editions, but for the treatment of users too. We're a big family > > working for a common objective: a world in which every single human > being > > can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. > > > > Why we treat ourselves like co-workes when we have so many things in > > common? Why we have to be a firm when we could be friends who works > > together for the common good? Why not reduce the unnecessary bureaucracy > > among the editors communication with Wikilove? It's just a way to make > the > > Wikimedia projects friendly and really collaborative! > > Just because often it contradicts efficiency. Some people come here to > make friends, other come to have the job done (some of them have an agenda, > and others just want indeed to increase the sum of knowledge). For me > personally, making friends sounds like opposite to efficiency, because I > care about quality first. I see from the discussions that there are people > like me. I also know there are many people unlike me, for whom the > collaborative aspect is more important than the result. This is fine with > me. I just do not want any universal decisions to be made under assumptions > that we are all alike. We are not. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l