I find the idea that one might discount the views of editors by claiming that we are ignoring the views of readers a bit bizarre when discussing a feature that by definition is used by editors. Consequently any consensus or statistics on feedback from editors that may have actually used such tools would seem the most relevant and essential if we are to credibly judge the value of such improvements for the community and impact on content.
Cheers, Fae _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
