2% of the 17, I believe (don't quote me on that), and yeah, saving an edit is the metric. I think we could probably improve things by providing guidance on markup or something; I imagine for the other 14.6 percent the process goes something along the lines of "oh, it says I can make the changes myself, lets do thaWAUGH, WHAT IN CTHULU'S NAME DOES ALL THIS TEXT MEAN"
On 31 October 2011 12:39, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 October 2011 12:30, Oliver Keyes <scire.fac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not sure about that specific change, but one illustration might be the > > Article Feedback Tool, which contains a "you know you can edit, right?" > > thing. Off the top of my head I think 17.4 percent of the 30-40,000 > people > > who use it per day attempt to edit as a result of that inducement. > > Admittedly only 2 percent of them *succeed*, but it's not a lack of > > motivation, methinks. > > > What's the definition of "succeed" there - they save an edit with a change? > > Is that 2% of the 17.4%, or 2% of those giving feedback? > > I wonder if there's a way to detect a failure to edit and ask what went > wrong. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Oliver Keyes Community Liason, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l