Wikipedia just can make protests when we're talking things which could affect
the integrity of website.
If we take down for political reasons, will not be long to take down for
religious reasons and others opinionated reasons.
Neutrality is a pillar of Wiki. My opinion is to only manifest ourselves when
our Wikimedia is in existencial danger.
_____________________
MateusNobre
MetalBrasil on Wikimedia projects
(+55) 85 88393509
30440865
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:51:08 -0400
> From: kirill.loks...@gmail.com
> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] just wondering, are we going to take down
> en.wikipedia.org?
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:52 PM, emijrp <emi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Additional reasons to shut down English Wikipedia as protest ASAP
> >
> > http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-cuts-funding-for-unesco-after-palestinian-vote-1.392996
>
>
> This has little enough to do with Wiki(m/p)edia, however; while UNESCO's
> mission does have some overlap with that of the WMF, we are not connected
> to them in any substantive way. Certainly, the mere fact that a cultural
> institution of some sort has had its funding cut should not cause us to do
> anything spectacularly unusual, as that's a fairly routine event these days.
>
> Kirill
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
