Am 29.11.2011 13:45, schrieb David Gerard: > On 29 November 2011 12:03, Tobias Oelgarte > <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> What i found to be the best solution so far was the "blurred images >> filter". You can 'opt-in' to enable it and all images will be blurred as >> the default. Since they are only blurred you will get a rough impression >> on what to expect (something the what a hidden image can't do) and an >> blurred image can be viewed by just hovering the mouse cursor over it. >> While you browse, not a single click is needed. On top of that it is >> awfully easy to implement, we already have a running version of it (see >> brainstorming page), it doesn't feed any information to actual censors >> and it is in no way a violation with NPOV. So far i didn't hear any >> constructive critic why this wouldn't be a very good solution. > > I gave one before: > > > From the far side of the office, a blurred penis on your screen looks > like a blurred penis on your screen. > > For this reason, I suggest a blank grey square instead. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > Just use another imageprocessingfilter and it will not look like a blurred penis, but maybe like a distorted penis or an arm.
_______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l