one usage could be to support photo competitions as wiki loves monuments, where a jury had to select good photos out of 160000 submitted. On Nov 29, 2011 8:51 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> It'd be good! I'm not sure what the usefulness would be, though. So, the > two aims behind the AFT: > > > - To prompt greater feedback from readers on the quality of content; > - To try (through the calls to action, which have actually been pretty > successful) to prompt readers to edit. > > I'm not sure how applicable these would be to Commons. I mean, how many > "readers" per se does the project get? The interface doesn't really lend > itself to browsing. It'd also be awkward trying to work out what they could > actually do, or what the feedback would be useful for; with traditional > wikis, if people go "this article sucks" we can fix it. If people go "this > image sucks" we can't necessarily take a new one, or tweak the old one to > make it better. > > Still, it's an interesting idea. I do like the possibility of maybe having > a rating box that prompts readers "do you have an image of this? If so, why > not upload it?" or whatever if they provide a sucky rating for a photo. > I'll drop the devs a note and see what their plans are in this field :). > > On 29 November 2011 19:36, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > that looks really nice, as well the intention behind it! for pictures, or > > commons in general, a rating model like the one already implements would > be > > more appropriate, what you think? > > On Nov 29, 2011 8:20 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <oke...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > > Well, if you've seen AFT5 (you may not have, so - > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5 > ) > > > we're moving away from "rating" articles. > > > > > > On 29 November 2011 19:13, rupert THURNER <rupert.thur...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > would it be possible to have a rating for pictures as well? > > > > On Nov 29, 2011 6:17 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <oke...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey guys! > > > > > > > > > > Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2 > > > > December, > > > > > at 19:00 UTC. If you're vaguely interested in playing around with > > > > > prototypes, you should attend - we'll have a lot of cool stuff to > > poke > > > at > > > > > (and then complain about when something breaks and it goes all > > melty). > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Oliver Keyes > > > > > Community Liason, Product Development > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > foundation-l mailing list > > > > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > Unsubscribe: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > foundation-l mailing list > > > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Oliver Keyes > > > Community Liason, Product Development > > > Wikimedia Foundation > > > _______________________________________________ > > > foundation-l mailing list > > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Community Liason, Product Development > Wikimedia Foundation > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l