> Hmmm... do some of the editors have such a problem with entries that are > in progress that they decide to propose them for deletion rather than > attempt to support the efforts of the original author by adding to the > content or make any effort to improve the article rather than remove it? > > Isn't WP supposed to help people by expanding our knowledge and > improving the transmission of information? > > I've just been subjected to a rather bizarre bunch of activity by > Mythpage88, who seems anxious to delete everything I've written over the > years in WP on the basis that it isn't "notable". > > The work I've documented is a vital part of the arts history in the > Silicon Valley during the 1990's - a time when the Internet was making a > tremendous impact on original work in performing arts. For example: > Virtual Valley might have been sponsored by Pacific Bell and San Jose > Metro, but it was the very first time that non-profits had with the > ability to use the Internet. > > Why shouldn't this be documented on WP? If you think something is an > "Ad" then rewrite it - don't delete it just because you can! >
Can you point us to a dialogue you have had with Mythpage88? What's bugging him? Fred _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
