On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:32 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 March 2012 05:03, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am sorry to say that unless you are prepared to put your foot down, and >> represent the tens of thousands of people who expressed their views in the >> (admittedly suboptimal) referendum, you risk becoming an irrelevancy – in >> exactly the same way that doctors are irrelevant in an asylum where it's >> the inmates who call the shots, and the doctors are only kept on for show, >> to keep the public money coming in. > > > Yeah, 'cos that worked so well applied to de:wp. > > You do realise this has become a toxic electoral issue for the board, > with people who voted twice for the resolution now backpedalling? > > > - d.
Just for the record, not sure where you got "voted twice"... There's been one vote on each resolution. And it was not raised as an electoral issue. I think that's a little unfair to people (including myself) who are trying to do their best in a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation. all best, -- phoebe _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
