On 5 March 2012 22:07, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 March 2012 20:40, Chris Keating <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I suspect a court would hold that the set of "cakes" is disjoint from the >> set of "objects on permanent display", and thus that a photograph of cake >> can never benefit from freedom of panorama. > Well you say that but slices of Charles and Diana's wedding cake have > turned up at auction as recently as 2008. I wonder how many cakes you would have if you assembled all the fragments. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
