On 8 March 2012 07:13, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 AM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, yeah, things are on hold essentially because there are more urgent >> things to do, and because given the rather extraordinary scale of the >> debate and all of the controversy, serious reconsideration of our >> original proposal has been requested. > I love corporate speak. "has been requested" Er, Who requsted what? > And precisely by which means and avenues?! This screams for a > need for clarification.!!!! Passive voice is indeed problematic here. What would that sentence look like in active voice? - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
